What were the reasons for the violence during the transfer of power in America and who is responsible for them?

 During the process of transfer of power in the United States, whatever happened outside and inside the Parliament, it is a matter of shame not only for america but for the whole democratic world, the country who  preaches democracy to the world and even trying to impose democratic methods in other countries. it also opens the pole of all his weaknesses. There is no doubt that it was US President Donald Trump who instigated his supporters who entered the Parliament and spread chaos, but the question is how the President of the world's most powerful democratic country was able to reject the election results like this? How did such challenges arise in the transfer of power in the most powerful country like America, from the point of view of democracy? Let us look at the shortcomings due to which a country like America also faced worldwide criticism. 

Old and complex electoral process.

 This was made possible by an election process fraught with flaws and complications. Now America should understand that it needs to repair its election system. Along with this, he also needs to avoid the politics that divides the society. It is not hidden from anyone that there was a gap between American society even before the presidential election. This was clearly visible during the black community's angry protests against the police's reckless strictness. During the elections, the 

gap was widened.

 Elections in covid period  

Due to the elections in the time of Corona , on a large scale postal voting took places. Old records of voting were broken with postal voting. Democratic Party candidate Joe Biden was unofficially declared victorious in this bumper voting election, but President and Republican Party candidate Donald Trump was not ready to give up. Ignoring the election results trump started claiming his victory. Although Trump received more votes than in 2016, he lost due to falling behind in some important states.  Trump's election team resorted to all legal bets, but except in a few cases they did not get relief from the judiciary. Even after this, he kept on chanting his victory. Due to this, the division of American society was seen to increase rather than decrease. 

Irresponsible attitude of trump.

 Trump had previously been accused of dividing American society. These allegations were further accentuated when black people took to the streets against police violence. Despite such accusations and Trump's refusal to give up, hardly anyone would have expected anything like that happened before and within the US Parliament on January 6, the Capitol Building. On this day, when a joint meeting of the two houses of the US Parliament, the House of Representatives and the Senate, was being held to formally recognize the election results, a large number of Trump supporters entered the Parliament complex. Trump is said to have instigated him for this. Whatever the truth, Trump's fiercest supporters vandalized the parliament. This disrupted the functioning of this very important joint session of the US Parliament. This has never happened in America before. 

Trump's flattering suggestion.

Think of Mike Pompeo, the US Secretary of State, who warned in March 2016 that Trump would be an autocratic president, who ignored  Constitution and who promised a smooth start to the second Trump administration after the election in November. The Republican Party is now on the verge of a moral plight. I am saying this as someone who always voted for the Republican Party until 2016 and who by this week was expected to be dominated by Rip in the Senate to bow to the Biden administration. I also call it a party of people who have generally preserved their principles, maintained their respect and remained calm over the last five years, not Brad Raffansparger, Mitt Romney, Denver Riggleman, Larry Hogan, Ben Sass ( Disappointingly this list is small) such as a party of courageous Republicans. But key members of the party and their cheerleaders in the right-wing media were not far off from creating the atmosphere in which violent incidents took place in the Parliament House (Capitol). Legal advisers such as Rudy Gialiani to Mark Levine have deliberately promoted malicious claims about electoral rigging. All these alleged quiet minds were involved in Conservative wrongdoings. Who encouraged the president of America Donald Trump to pursue his legal options. (Although they were well aware that this is nonsense, they assured that they would resolve doubts about the legality of the vote.

126 Republican lawmakers signed a redundant memorandum in support of a lawsuit filed to overturn the Texas election Which the Supreme Court rejected in a single paragraph. Ted Cruise, whom I once called a snake wrapped in vaseline, turned out to be worse than that. Mike Pence supported Trump's blatant fantasies until the constitutional truth was revealed. Some of these hypocrites are now differentiating themselves from Wednesday's violence by tweeting carefully. But Cruise, Hawley, Pence, and others who acted hopelessly have done more harm to Congress than the crowd. Broken doors Can be done, not broken parties. Above all is the President, who, of course, was not involved in it, but he is completely, undeniably and inexcusably responsible for it.

conclusion

this disaster in Parliament has severely hurt America's reputation. When America is surrounded by all internal problems and it is facing a serious challenge from China at the international level, then the challenges of Biden are going to take over power. I do not know how he will face these challenges, but the world needs to learn a lesson from what happened in America. The first lesson is to understand the basic fact that disagreement is not synonymous with anarchy. Trump took his disagreement with the election results to the extent of anarchy. If he is surrounded by all-round condemnation, then no one can be held responsible for this. Along with Trump's undemocratic approach, it should not be overlooked that in recent times there have been many movements in America, which have shown the gap between disagreement and anarchy. Like other countries of the world, India also has such elements, who keep on working to justify and justify chaos on the pretext of disagreement. They not only have to be careful, but they also have to be discouraged.